This post was written with the help of the author: Robert Phelps is a master in Philology at New York University. He is currently working as one of the best writers at the https://nonamelab.com Also he studies the history of the game industry.

Animal rights have been debated over the recent years without reaching conclusions and making decisions regarding the issue. During the discussions, individuals have been trying to determine whether it is justifiable to protect animals and their environment from potential harm done by humans. The supporters of animal rights suggest that animals possess the same exclusive rights as people, and thus, they must be defended at all costs. The stated above fact means that various stakeholders should come up with proper actions to resolve the issue. One of the spheres where animals have been used is testing, especially the one aimed at determining whether certain medications are safe for humans which is opposed by the animal rights activists. Therefore, the paper will argue for the need to come up with regulations and provisions that support animal rights in the society focusing mainly on their exploitation in medical tests.
To begin with, the proponents of animals argue that it is important to save the lives of the latter by not using them in experiments as testing medical products on the animals definitely hurts them. Although certain products might not lead to direct harm, but they may have negative impact on their social habits and lives. Furthermore, most of the medical products tested on the animals are usually not approved for the use by the humans, and such a situation exposes them to high risks of being hurt. Lastly, it is unacceptable to test medicine on animals as people have a completely different genetic makeup which means that medical findings received during experiments could be unreliable.
In addition, the death of the animals during the testing has no advantage to people. It is clear that when an animal dies, humans do not get any benefits. It can be explained by the fact that when the environment is affected, people will be harmed as well. The environment consists of numerous delicate processes, and if they are negatively influenced, it could lead to a sequence of bad effects on humans. In this particular case, the killing of the animals creates imbalance within the ecosystem that can have significant adverse impact on the entire environment. People should not undermine the overall composition of the surroundings as the nature is a huge value to all humanity and must be protected at all times.
Animal testing is also a direct violation and disruption of animal rights. Undoubtedly, their use in experiments could lead to reliable and good outcomes and great innovations in the medical field. However, during the testing, animals are usually placed in stressful locations and situations. Such tense environment and unpleasant conditions may result in specific adjustments of animals that may distort the testing results and findings.
Furthermore, humans should make efforts to avoid testing medical products on animals because it is expensive. The high cost of the experiments can be explained by the complex nature of procedures. Moreover, during the process, animals need care, food, and shelter that demands additional expenses. Thus, in general, expenditures are really high. It leads to the conclusion that irrespective of the violations of animal rights, the heavy financial cost of conducting the procedures should retain people from testing on animals.
However, opponents of animal rights activists argue that the use of animals in medical research is critical in promoting advancement in the field. What they claim is that although it is clear that such experiments can result in significant harm done to animals, human life is more important and worthwhile than the one of animals. In such instances, the testing of the medications on animals has a significant contribution towards the development of research of vaccines and new drugs. Thus, it is clear that this will help in improving the medical field and saving many peoples lives. For example, a lot of drugs tested on animals and proven to be safe for use by humans could help in preventing and treating serious health conditions such as cancer and diabetes.
In addition, the use of animals for testing medical products is beneficial in reducing the risks people face. When a bad thing happens during the experiments with the use of animals, it will not do significant harm to humans. Based on this, the animal experiments are useful in improving the safety of many individuals lives. The levels of peoples exposure to dangerous items are also reduced, and thus, this makes it possible to avoid many diseases. Paying attention to the stated above, one can infer that animal testing aimed to reduce the threats and dangers humans face at the cost of animal lives is justifiable.
Another argument the supporters of the use of animals in experiments make is that it helps to make testing on humans that follows the one conducted on animals safer or avoid it. In the modern environment, there are many substances expected to benefit people, but a few of them are dangerous. When drugs are tested on humans, it is immoral, and many individuals would be unwilling to give consent to such experiments involving people due to high risks of exposure to harmful substances. With regard to this, animal testing is seen as a safe alternative which allows people to review the degree of safety of some medications which can be used in the treatment of different conditions. New medicine poses serious threats to humans, and tests performed on the animals give scientists an opportunity to understand their real effects on the individuals body and organs (Wrenn 180). Overall, testing of drugs on animals makes it possible to ensure that testing of products on humans will not lead to severe effects.
In summary, it is clear that it is significant to support animals rights, protect their environment and avoid the disruption of their lives. There are people who claim that testing on animals could lead to reliable and good outcomes. Furthermore, the use of animals in experiments is beneficial as it decreases the risks people encounter. The exposure of humans to dangerous substances is also reduced making it possible to avoid many diseases. Lastly, animal testing also helps in improving the safety of human testing. However, even though certain experiments could lead to great innovations in the medical field, it is unacceptable to test medical products on animals. There are numerous reasons for this. Firstly, humans have a different genetic makeup and such medical findings could be unreliable. Moreover, individuals should not undermine the overall composition of the environment as nature and animals as its part have a huge value to the humanity and must be protected at all times. There is no doubt that the experiments performed on animals could be substituted. Nevertheless, for some reasons, people are not focused on getting alternative solutions. The humanity should try to come up with other options rather than continue using animals as experiment specimens.